More input on Metro's University Line

032106_metrotrain.jpgMore than 500 people turned out at Metro's meeting on the proposed University light rail line last night, and most of them said they want the line to be run along Westpark rather than Richmond Avenue. The meeting at St. Luke's United Methodist Church was held to give residents a chance to weigh in on the debate: Though the initial light rail referendum called for a line along Westpark, Metro has started thinking that Richmond might be a better idea. The agency is relying on a clause in the resolution that says the "final scope ... and other details" of the long-range rail plan would be based on "demand and completion of the project development process, including community input."

Metro contends that running the line along Westpark wouldn't serve riders well because ... well, because there would be no reason for people to ride a light rail line along Westpark, as there's nowhere on Westpark people would want to go (unless Metro includes a Goode Co. Barbeque station). Richmond residents and business owners say putting the line on their street would kill off businesses and make property values plummet.

Meanwhile, we're wondering if all this disagreement will mean we end up being stuck with a single nifty, but ultimately pointless, 7.5-mile rail line. As Mayor Bill White said at yesterday's meeting, "Without some agreement between the chair of Metro and its board and me ... there is not going to be some new rapid transit route in west Houston." Metro officials say a decision will be made on the line's alignment late this year.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@houstonist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Email This Entry


To increase the security and stability of our sites, Gothamist has decided to stop collecting or storing commenter logins. To comment, please login with Disqus, Facebook, or Twitter. If you want to claim your previous comments, please create a Disqus login, and then claim them using these instructions. Thanks!

Comments [rss]