<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Houstonist: Council gives preliminary OK to Village project</title>
<link>http://houstonist.com/2006/10/19/council_gives_p.php</link>
<description>All comments for Council gives preliminary OK to Village project</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 adamnewton</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>adam@houstonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>adam@houstonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>jim</title>
<link>http://houstonist.com/2006/10/19/council_gives_p.php#comment-481859</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://houstonist.com/2006/10/19/council_gives_p.php#comment-481859</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:46:28 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You&apos;re right, the existing building is ugly. But that&apos;s not the point: The issue here is how the Village, a small neighborhood of narrow streets that are already congested, will support a project of this density. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>bobbers33</title>
<link>http://houstonist.com/2006/10/19/council_gives_p.php#comment-481787</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://houstonist.com/2006/10/19/council_gives_p.php#comment-481787</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:30:37 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;You say that it is wrong to redevelope the village, but just incase you have never driven down Bolsover, and not seen the current building, let me inform you.  Currently, there is an extrememly ugly 1960s type utilitarian building along with a couple of other small buildings. IT IS REALLY REALLY UGLY.  If I were you I would check it out so that you understand why it is being torn down.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>