<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Houstonist: River Oaks update: they might be landmarks after all</title>
<link>http://houstonist.com/2007/04/24/river_oaks_upda_2.php</link>
<description>All comments for River Oaks update: they might be landmarks after all</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 Brittanie Shey</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:00:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>brittanie@houstonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>brittanie@houstonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>jim</title>
<link>http://houstonist.com/2007/04/24/river_oaks_upda_2.php#comment-1075405</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://houstonist.com/2007/04/24/river_oaks_upda_2.php#comment-1075405</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:38:49 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The bad thing is, nothing happens in that 90-day period — it&apos;s supposedly a time for the property owner to think, &quot;Oh yeah, I really shouldn&apos;t tear this historic building down!&quot; But will Weingarten do that? Ha!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>SomeGuy</title>
<link>http://houstonist.com/2007/04/24/river_oaks_upda_2.php#comment-1075399</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://houstonist.com/2007/04/24/river_oaks_upda_2.php#comment-1075399</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:34:44 -0600</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Woo-Hoo! What happens in that 90 day period?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>