A look at the U-Line impact study

080707_metrorail.jpgSo the Draft Environmental Impact Study for Metro's proposed University light rail line has been released — a lot of information that a lot of people will be poring over. Fortunately, Christof at Intermodality has a summary of the DEIS for the line's western segment already, and here's what he found:

  • There are three alignment options for the Main-to-Hillcroft segment of the University Line: Richmond to Cummins to Westpark, Richmond to Greenway to Westpark, and Richmond to Montrose to 59 to Kirby to Westpark.
  • The Richmond-Cummins-Westpark option has 11 stations, the Greenway option has 10 (one fewer station in Greenway Plaza) and the 59 option has seven, with no stops at Dunlavy, Kirby, Buffalo Speedway or Weslayan — which, it would seem, would eliminate access to the line for a lot of potential riders.
  • The Cummins alignment — which would keep the line on Richmond Avenue through Greenway Plaza, allowing for two stations serving the office buildings, residences and Lakewood Church there — would have a 25 percent higher ridership than the 59 option (an estimated 43,590 daily boardings for Cummins vs. 31,920 for 59) and would cost the least ($534 million) of the three alignments.
  • The DEIS also includes Bus Rapid Transit options for the three alignments (which would involve buses running on dedicated guideways that could later be used for rail) and an option for improved local bus service. There's also a "no-build" option, which is pretty self-explanatory.

Part of the concern over building the University line has been that it would wreak havoc with traffic. As Christof notes, traffic is going to be bad along the Richmond/Westpark corridor whether there's rail or not: Without rail, every major street intersection along the corridor is expected to be very congested by 2030. With rail, some of the intersections would be a little worse and some better. What's interesting, though, is that running the line along Highway 59 would apparently be a disaster: The support columns for the elevated rail structure would take a lane from the southbound 59 frontage road between Shepherd and Kirby and the outside shoulder from the southbound freeway between Shepherd and Spur 527. That could cause backups on the frontage road and would slow traffic on the freeway itself because people don't drive as fast when they're driving next to barriers.

As for the impact on properties along the routes, it definitely exists. About a quarter of the properties along the line on Richmond would be affected, mostly by losing a small strip of parking lot or landscaping. The Highway 59 option would require taking parts of between 31 and 46 properties along the frontage road. According to KHOU, the 59 option would also mean that all the buildings on the west side of Montrose Boulevard between Richmond and the freeway would go. The projected totals: between 12 and 13 businesses and between 13 and 24 residential units. A lot of property loss? It's relative: As Christof points out, the proposed Highway 290 expansion would take 100 houses, 300 apartment units, two churches and a hundred businesses.

Metro is accepting comments on the DEIS in writing through Sept. 15, and two open houses and a hearing have been scheduled on the project:

  • Monday, Aug. 13: 5 to 7 p.m. at the Holiday Inn Select, 2712 Southwest Freeway
  • Tuesday, Aug. 14: 5 to 7 p.m. at Wheeler Avenue Baptist Church, 3826 Wheeler Ave.
  • Monday, Aug. 27: open house from 1 to 2 p.m., public hearing at 2 p.m. at South Main Baptist Church, 4100 Main St.

---
Photo: flickr user weatherjester

Email This Entry


Comments (5) [rss]

With rail, some of the intersections would be a little worse and some better.

Is this your assessment, a paraphrase of Spieler's assessment, or your endorsement of Spieler's assessment?

When you guys just rewrite the copy of other people (instead of blockquoting), it can be very difficult for readers to tell when assessments are your own or belong to the people whose copy you are rewriting.

I have to wonder if METRO is stacking the deck for the Cummins line. It has the most stations, costs less than the other two options and has the highest ridership projections. The findings pretty much cinch it as the chosen route.

I doubt Metro is stacking any decks — I think Cummins is just the logical conclusion based on the population density around the stations and the cost of elevated structures, etc. But it's interesting that the Cummins route seems to have such an advantage in both areas.

Staying on Richmond the whole way is the best option. Fuck Culberson and Afton Oaks.

Me likee the second "guest" commenter. Knows how to cut to the heart of the matter! ;)

Post a comment (Comment Policy)

Tips

About Houstonist

Houstonist is a website about Houston. More

Editors: Jason Bargas and Jim Parsons
Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

The Children's Museum of Houston has some great holiday events coming up in November and December! C
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Houstonist.

All Our RSS